Fake images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual assessment of image credibility online
Shen, C., Kasra, M., Pan, W., Bassett, G. A., Malloch, Y., & O’Brien, J. F. (2019). Fake images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual assessment of image credibility online. New media & society, 21(2), 438-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799526 (pdf récupéré à : https://escholarship.org/content/qt9rm0q3nc/qt9rm0q3nc_noSplash_0cc61c32e71a7943d89a07fed54c0452.pdf)
Cet article est en construction: un auteur est en train de le modifier.
En principe, le ou les auteurs en question devraient bientôt présenter une meilleure version.
Résumé des auteur·trice·s
Fake or manipulated images propagated through the Web and social media have the capacity to deceive, emotionally distress, and influence public opinions and actions. Yet few studies have examined how individuals evaluate the authenticity of images that accompany online stories. This article details a 6-batch large-scale online experiment using Amazon Mechanical Turk that probes how people evaluate image credibility across online platforms. In each batch, participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 28 news-source mockups featuring a forged image, and they evaluated the credibility of the images based on several features. We found that participants’ Internet skills, photo-editing experience, and social media use were significant predictors of image credibility evaluation, while most social and heuristic cues of online credibility (e.g. source trustworthiness, bandwagon, intermediary trustworthiness) had no significant impact. Viewers’ attitude toward a depicted issue also positively influenced their credibility evaluation.'