Nouvelles pages

1 avril 2026

• 10:371 avril 2026 à 10:37 Fonctions intéressantes dans R (hist | modifier) [831 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Liste de fonctions intéressantes dans R '''ifelse()''' (une utilisation particulière): on peut transformer une variable dichotomique en dummy variable en une seule ligne avec cette fonction: * résultat <- ifelse(variableN == "Yes", 1, 0) * signifie : tous les individus de la variableN qui ont la valeur "Yes" sont transformés en "1", les autres sont transformés en 0 '''aggregate()''': résumer facilement un gros dataset * p.ex. : aggregate(my_data[,c("st... »)

16 mars 2026

• 11:3416 mars 2026 à 11:34 Calculs de puissance (hist | modifier) [3 342 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Cette page est dédiée aux calculs de puissance avec G*Power == Pour une ANOVA 2x2 design inter == Tiré du cours 7 de statistiques I de Paolo Ghisletta (vers 1:18:00). C'est un design inter où on compare la difficulté de mots (connu/inconnu) et des types de méthodes (définition de dictionnaire / lecture dans un passage qui traite du sujet) {| class="wikitable" |+ Tableau des scores |- ! !! num DF !! den DF !! MSE !! F !! pes !! Pr(>F) |- | Mot || Exemp... »)

4 mars 2026

• 18:574 mars 2026 à 18:57 Pictures and repeated exposure increase perceived accuracy of news headlines (hist | modifier) [9 043 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Smelter, T. J., & Calvillo, D. P. (2020). Pictures and repeated exposure increase perceived accuracy of news headlines. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(5), 1061-1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3684 == Abstract des auteurs == ''Fake news, deliberately inaccurate and often biased information that is presented as accurate reporting, is perceived as a serious threat. Recent research on fake news has documented a high general susceptibility to the phenomenon and... »)

24 février 2026

• 12:2024 février 2026 à 12:20 Non-probative Photos Promote the Truth of Positive Claims (hist | modifier) [1 850 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Cardwell, B. A. (2015). Non-probative Photos Promote the Truth of Positive Claims (Version 1). Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17009486.v1 {{En construction}} »)

23 février 2026

• 14:4723 février 2026 à 14:47 Nonprobative photos inflate the truthiness and falsiness of claims (hist | modifier) [24 536 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Newman, E. J. (2013). Nonprobative Photos Inflate the Truthiness and Falsiness of Claims. Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17003764.v1 == Abstract de l'autrice == ''When people evaluate claims they often rely on what comedian Stephen Colbert calls truthiness, judging claims using subjective feelings of truth, rather than drawing on facts. Over seven experiments I examined how nonprobative phot... »)

16 février 2026

• 13:2416 février 2026 à 13:24 A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making (hist | modifier) [10 142 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making. In The experience of thinking (pp. 11-32). Psychology Press. Récupéré à https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christian-Unkelbach-2/publication/285130501_A_general_model_of_fluency_effects_in_judgment_and_decision_making/links/58779de008ae329d622800e1/A-general-model-of-fluency-effects-in-judgment-and-decision-making.pdf == Abstract des auteurs == ''Pr... »)

10 février 2026

• 16:3410 février 2026 à 16:34 Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning (hist | modifier) [2 354 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017 == Abstract des auteurs == ''Brain images are believed to have a particularly persuasive influence on the public perception of research on cognition. Three experiments are reported showing that presenting brain images with articles summarizing cognitive neuroscien... »)
• 16:2510 février 2026 à 16:25 On the (non)persuasive power of a brain image (hist | modifier) [2 484 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Michael, R. B., Newman, E. J., Vuorre, M., Cumming, G., & Garry, M. (2013). On the (non) persuasive power of a brain image. ''Psychonomic bulletin & review, 20''(4), 720-725. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0391-6 == Abstract des auteur·trice·s == ''The persuasive power of brain images has captivated scholars in many disciplines. Like others, we too were intrigued by the finding that a brain image makes accompanying information more credible (McCabe & Cas... »)

9 février 2026

• 17:449 février 2026 à 17:44 Truthiness and Falsiness of Trivia Claims Depend on Judgmental Contexts (hist | modifier) [1 713 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Newman, E. J., Garry, M., Unkelbach, C., Bernstein, D. M., Lindsay, D. S., & Nash, R. A. (2015). Truthiness and falsiness of trivia claims depend on judgmental contexts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000099 {{En construction}} == Abstract des auteur·trice·s == ''When people rapidly judge the truth of claims presented with or without related but nonprobative photos, the phot... »)
• 16:599 février 2026 à 16:59 Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity (hist | modifier) [1 905 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. ''Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 16''(1), 107-112. Récupéré à https://bear.warrington.ufl.edu/brenner/mar7588/Papers/hasher-et-al-jvvb-1977.pdf == Abstract des auteur·trice·s == ''Subjects rated how certain they were that each of 60 statements was true or false. The statements were sampled from areas of knowledge including politics, spor... »)

5 février 2026

• 15:095 février 2026 à 15:09 Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (hist | modifier) [3 295 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 225. Voir : https://rips-irsp.com/articles/irsp.8#B8 et : https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225/full Catégorie:Résumés d'articles Catégorie:Théories du complot Catégorie:Questi... »)
• 15:015 février 2026 à 15:01 Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracist Beliefs (hist | modifier) [3 437 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. ''Applied cognitive psychology, 24''(6), 749-761. https://10.1002/acp.1583 (avec VPN?) == Abstract des auteur·trice·s == ''Given the widespread appeal of conspiratorial beliefs, it is surprising that very little empirical research has examined the psychological variables... »)
• 14:355 février 2026 à 14:35 Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale (hist | modifier) [3 735 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale. ''International Review of Social Psychology, 29''(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.8 == Résumé des auteur·trice·s == ''We designed, in French and in English, a single-item scale to measure people’s general tendency to believe in conspiracy theories. The validity and reliability of this scale was a... »)

27 janvier 2026

• 10:5227 janvier 2026 à 10:52 The WYSIATI-Effect and Biased Arbitrators (hist | modifier) [2 142 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec «  Risse, J. (2021). The WYSIATI-Effect and Biased Arbitrators. ''ASA Bulletin, 39'', 315. https://doi.org/10.54648/asab2021028 ( {{En construction}} == Résumé de l'auteur == ''An arbitrator's ability to decide a case in a rational manner is impacted by psychological patterns of thought. Those are deeply engraved in our brain and are commonly called “biases”. One of the most dangerous and best-researched biases is the “What you see-is-all-there-is”-Effe... »)

21 janvier 2026

• 17:4821 janvier 2026 à 17:48 Fake images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual assessment of image credibility online (hist | modifier) [12 897 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Shen, C., Kasra, M., Pan, W., Bassett, G. A., Malloch, Y., & O’Brien, J. F. (2019). Fake images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual assessment of image credibility online. ''New media & society, 21''(2), 438-463. == Résumé des auteur·trice·s == ''Fake or manipulated images propagated through the Web and social media have the capacity to deceive, emotionally distress, and influence public opinions and actions. Yet... »)

7 janvier 2026

• 17:147 janvier 2026 à 17:14 Knowledge Does Not Protect Against Illusory Truth (hist | modifier) [1 578 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. ''Journal of experimental psychology: general, 144''(5), 993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000098.supp Récupéré à https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/xge-0000098.pdf == Abstract des auteur·trice·s == ''In daily life, we frequently encounter false claims in the form of consumer advertisements, political propaganda, and rumors. Repe... »)

6 janvier 2026

• 17:526 janvier 2026 à 17:52 Believing that Humans Swallow Spiders in Their Sleep: False Beliefs as Side Effects of the Processes that Support Accurate Knowledge (hist | modifier) [33 583 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Marsh, E. J., Cantor, A. D., & Brashier, N. M. (2016). Believing that humans swallow spiders in their sleep: False beliefs as side effects of the processes that support accurate knowledge. In ''Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 64, pp. 93-132)''. Academic Press. C'est un chapitre de livre == Introduction == === The Issue at Hand === === Defining Knowledge === == General Properties of the Knowledge Base == === The Knowledge Base Has No Known Capacit... »)
• 12:546 janvier 2026 à 12:54 The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction (hist | modifier) [7 165 octets] Admin (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., ... & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. ''Nature Reviews Psychology, 1''(1), 13-29. == Abstract des auteur·trice·s == Misinformation has been identified as a major contributor to various contentious contemporary events ranging from elections and referenda to the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only c... »)